The new “sex movie” was surprisingly tame after all the fuss – “Just being on the floor of the quad is not daring”

The new “sex movie” was surprisingly tame after all the fuss – “Just being on the floor of the quad is not daring”

Kuva: © Scanbox Entertainment

Nicole Kidman’s erotic drama Babygirl has gathered a lot of media space in recent months. Today you can see the film in theaters in Finland as well.

In Babygirl, directed by Halina Reijn, an influential CEO (Nicole Kidman) puts her career and family on the line when she begins a passionate relationship with her much younger intern (Harris Dickinson).

The age limit for Babygirl is K16 and the film is moderately daring for a big Hollywood star, but just because of the sex scenes, it’s not really worth going to see the novelty. They are considerably tamer than what could have been concluded from all the preliminary fuss.

Clearly the best thing about Babygirl is Nicole Kidman’s performance, otherwise the film is a pretty average performance.

“Babygirl is reminiscent of Fatal Attraction or Basic Instinct sex thrillers from the 1980s and 1990s. However, Babygirl is not a thriller, but a drama, which, despite its numerous sex scenes, is a very clinical production. There is strangely little eroticism in the subjugation film,” critic Aki Lehti writes in his review.

“Nicole Kidman plays a great role as a woman who wants to be subjugated, but the sex scenes in Babygirl are very tame. In the pictures, the bare buttocks of the two main actors are glimpsed. Just moaning and being on the floor of the quad is not daring. After Demi Moore’s role in The Substance, even the scene where Kidman is injected with botox feels weak.”

Read the full review here:

Review | The movie Babygirl, famous for its sex scenes, sucks without erotica

Source: muropaketti.com