GeForce RTX 4060 versus GeForce RTX 4060 Ti in 2024

The GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX 4060 Ti are two of the most important graphics cards currently populating the mid-range. The “Ti” designation indicates that the latter is more powerful than the former, and therefore places it within what we can consider as gama media «premium»something that is reflected in both the performance and the sales price.

Both They use the same architecturea detail that is very important, because it means that we will not find differences between the two in terms of support for advanced technologies, and that regardless of the model we choose we will enjoy the same latest generation technologies, among which Frame Generation stands out.

This was precisely one of the most important differences that we had to take into account when comparing the GeForce RTX 4060 versus the GeForce RTX 3060, since in this case the former has an advantage thanks to the Ada Lovelace architecture, which brings important advances and gives it support for Frame Generation, a technology that not supported on GeForce RTX 3060.

The truth is that both have many things in common, and this makes doubts arise when choosing between both models. which is better in terms of price-performancea question that I want to help you resolve today with this article, where we are going to thoroughly compare both graphics cards to help you make the right decision.

I will also take into account the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBa special version that NVIDIA launched in response to certain critics who said that 8 GB was not enough for a graphics card of this type. What can I say, we are looking at a graphics card specialized in 1080p, and at that level 8 GB is enough, although we will talk about the subject of graphic memory later on, because this subject is being mythologized too much.

GeForce RTX 4060 frente a RTX 4060 Ti

As I said before, two use the Ada Lovelace architecture, although They do not use the same graphics core. The GeForce RTX 4060 has the graphics core AD107which is the smallest and simplest of all the current generation GPUs from NVIDIA, while the Ti model uses the graphics core AD106a solution that best corresponds to what we can consider as mid-range.

The use of different GPUs already allows us to intuit that there is a notable difference between the two graphics cards, and to check this there is nothing better than to thoroughly review the specifications and features of both models. This will also give us a very important context that we need to continue delving deeper into this comparison.

GeForce RTX 4060 specifications

• AD107 graphics core at 5 nm.
• 18.9 billion transistors.
• Encapsulation area: 146 square mm.
• Graphics Processing Clusters (GPCs): 3.
• Texture Processing Clusters (TPCs): 12.
• 3.072 shaders a 1.830 MHz-2.460 MHz.
• 96 textured units.
• 48 raster units.
• 96 fourth-generation tensor cores.
• 24 third-generation RT cores.
• 128-bit memory bus.
• 8 GB of GDDR6 at 17 GHz with a bandwidth of 272 GB/s.
• 15.11 TFLOPS of power in FP32.
• 35 TFLOPS in ray tracing.
• 242 TFLOPs and FP8 (IA).
• 24MB L2 cache (453GB/s effective).
• TGP 115 watts, average consumption 110 watts.
• Uses PCIe Gen4 x8 standard.
• Requires an additional 8-pin power connector.
• Price from 299 euros.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti specifications

• AD106 graphics core in 5nm.
• 22.9 billion transistors.
• Graphics Processing Clusters (GPCs): 3.
• Texture Processing Clusters (TPCs): 17.
• 4,352 shaders at 2,310 MHz-2,535 MHz, normal and turbo mode.
• 136 textured units.
• 136 fourth-generation tensor cores.
• 48 raster units.
• 32 third-generation RT cores.
• Bus de 128 bits.
• 8 GB of GDDR6 at 18 GHz (288 GB/s also bandwidth).
• 22.06 TFLOPS of power in FP32.
• 51 TFLOPS in ray tracing.
• 353 TFLOPs and FP8 (IA).
• 32MB L2 cache (554GB/s effective).
• Uses PCIe Gen4 x8 standard.
• 160 watt TGP.
• Price from 411 euros.

As we anticipated, the use of a different GPU makes the specifications of both graphics cards very different both in terms of specifications and raw power in rasterization, ray tracing and AI. The Ti model clearly wins, as expected, since exceeds its FP32 power by 6.95 TFLOPSand it’s also much more powerful ray tracing and AI.

If we talk about consumption, both are positioned at a very good level, since they have very low consumption and this gives them a high level of efficiency. The GeForce RTX 4060 It has the advantage of consuming only 115 watts, This makes it a very affordable option that can be easily installed even in PCs with low power consumption. The Ti model consumes 55 watts more, but this is still within a very reasonable level and can easily handle a 500 watt power supply.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 1,280 more shadersalso has more texturing and rasterizing units, includes more RT cores and tensor cores, has more L2 cache and also achieves higher bandwidth both in said cache and in the graphic memory. Both models have 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

There is a version of the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti that has 16GB of graphics memory, but the price difference compared to the 8GB model is considerable, and it already enters a territory where There is too much treading on the GeForce RTX 4070which makes it not worth it and makes it better to invest a little more to directly buy the higher model, that is, that GeForce RTX 4070.

It’s very easy to understand, the GeForce RTX 4070 performs, on average, in all the most used resolutions (1080p, 1440p and 2160p) 35% more than the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBand can be purchased for 579 euros, which is 119 euros more than the cheapest GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB.

The price difference is one 25,87%but the performance improvement we get with the GeForce RTX 4070 is a 35%, which means that it offers a much more interesting value, and as I told you before, it is a better buy than the 16 GB model, which barely improves performance in very specific cases compared to the 8 GB model.

Returning to the comparison between the GeForce RTX 4060 and the RTX 4060 Ti, both have shaders Ada Lovelace3rd generation RT cores, 4th generation Tensor cores, and use a next-generation optical flow accelerator, meaning they are compatible with next-generation technologies that They don’t have support in Ampere:

• Shader Execution Reordering, which is done at the shader level and reorders the shader worker threads in real time, causing the threads to be ventilated faster and solving the classic problems of divergent execution.
• Tecnologías Displaced Micro-Mesh y Opacity Micro-Mask, that improve ray tracing performance by using microtriangle meshes and applying precise opacity and density determination to graphical elements.
• NVIDIA DLSS Frame Generation, which generates one additional frame entirely by AI for every two traditionally rendered frames. Combined with DLSS Super Resolution, it can increase the frame rate by up to five times.
• FP8/INT8 operations, thanks to the new fourth-generation tensor cores, which inherit the AI ​​capabilities already seen in NVIDIA’s Hopper architecture, used in graphics accelerators for servers and data centers.

Comparison of performance, consumption and price

Raw numbers are very important, but performance is even more important. Both graphics cards are specialized in 1080p resolution due to the design they use in the memory subsystem (128-bit bus). They can also offer good performance at 1440p, but as we will see later at this resolution the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti performs better due to its larger amount of L2 cache, and because it has a higher bandwidth.

As expected, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is much more powerful than the GeForce RTX 4060. On average we have a difference of one 24.17% more performance in favor of the first one in 1080p27.37% at 1440p and 21.60% at 1080p with ray tracing enabled. I know what you’re thinking, what does this mean for gaming? To explain this properly, we need to look at the second graph.

With both models we can play in optimal conditions at 1080p, since the GeForce RTX 4060 recorded an average of 90 FPS at 1080p. However, at 1440p it does not manage to maintain a stable 60 FPS in all cases and remains at an average of 57 FPSwhile the Ti model reaches the 73 FPS. So what I told you before happens, that the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is better prepared to run games at 1440p.

By activating ray tracing, the Ti model also demonstrates its greater power by being able to maintain an average of 65 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4060 remains at 54 FPS.

Now let’s move on to consumption. The GeForce RTX 4060 needs much less power and is more efficient, since It performs 24.17% less in 1080p but consumes 36% lessIts consumption is so low that we can use it without any problem with a 400 watt power supply, even if it is a basic model, as long as it meets a minimum quality standard.

Now let’s look at the performance per euro invested, or in other words, the frames generated per euro spent. Priced at €299.99, the GeForce RTX 4060 has a ratio of 0.3 frames per euro, and the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is at 0.26 frames per euro, which means that The first has a slightly higher performance-cost ratio.

The same is true at 1440p and with ray tracing at 1080p, the GeForce RTX 4060 is a slightly better value in terms of cost per frame, but keep in mind that the difference is so small that by the time we can buy a GeForce RTX 4060 Ti For less than 400 euros, things would change completely.A few weeks ago it was available for 379 euros, and that price was already one of the best on the market.

Final Notes: Which Model Should You Choose?

If your goal is to play at 1080p there is no doubt that, at current prices, the GeForce RTX 4060 It is a more balanced option and more affordable overall. With it you can play everything in that resolution with maximum or very high quality, enjoying good fluidity, and in very specific cases of very demanding games you can use DLSS 3 to improve the frame rate per second.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is best option if you’re going to play at 1440p, and it’s worth it if you can buy it for 400 euros or less. That would be the optimal price level to maximize the cost per frame value, so keep that in mind and keep an eye out for possible offers, since there is always movement in these ranges. You already know that at MuyComputer we usually share these types of offers whenever we can.

Regarding the 16 GB model, I think my opinion has already been made clear, it is too expensive for what it offers and it is not worth it because it is at odds with the GeForce RTX 4070. If you can afford to pay 450 euros for a 16 GB GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, do not buy it, save a little more and buy a GeForce RTX 4070, which performs 35% better on average and offers a far superior experience.

Keep in mind that even though the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12GB of graphics memory, it is much more powerful, has a 192-bit bus, uses much faster graphics memory, and has much more L2 cache, so it performs much better at 1440p and is even capable of delivering a good experience at 4K. This graphics card plays in a different league and the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB can’t compare with it. That’s why it’s worth investing 70 euros more and going for the GeForce RTX 4070.

Note: This selection contains some links from our affiliates, but none of the products included have been proposed or recommended by them or their manufacturers, but chosen according to our own criteria.