because the new reports could tell another truth

The first results of the second autopsy carried out on the body of Liliana Resinovichthe woman who disappeared from Trieste on 14 December 2021 and found her body in a grove of the former psychiatric hospital, not far from her home, on 5 January 2022.

When Liliana’s traces are lost, the research seems to move in the direction of identifying an adult who may have left voluntarily. So much so that even her husband Sebastiano, in his numerous and conflicting versions, would also state that he was not particularly worried about that absence, only to then report that he had seen Liliana upset the evening before her disappearance.

As the days go by, it also takes hold the hypothesis of a self-harming gesture implemented by the woman. From the analysis of the video of the moment Liliana’s body was found, the actions carried out by those who intervened on the scene seem to go more towards identifying the body than not preservation that could have been a primary or secondary or even tertiary crime scene.

The first autopsy carried out on the woman’s body revealed several lesions and bruises. In particular, an old fracture of the nose and other lesions or swellings on the woman’s face and head would be identified, with also a haemorrhagic infiltration on the tongue. Above all, Liliana’s death was placed, by the two experts who carried out the autopsy, within 48-72 hours from the moment of discovery.

The Prosecutor’s hypothesis would therefore be that of suicide. Liliana, whose body was found in excellent conservation conditions, with clean clothes and underwear and perfectly shaved, would have voluntarily left home that morning of 14 December 2021, and then remained hidden in a place or with someone who it would have allowed him to wash himself, take care of himself and also eat the same foods he had had breakfast with on the morning of his disappearance, given the gastric contents, and then decide to go to the grove to end his life.

Therefore Liliana would have walked in that place, along rather impervious paths, where she might have fallen or inadvertently bumped into some trees, thus explaining the bruises and injuries found, and then wearing a biodegradable bag on her head, fixing it to her neck with However, with a loose cord, therefore not functional to guarantee death by asphyxiation, she would have placed herself in two black bags (one inserted from the head and the other from the feet) and in a fetal position, she would have allowed herself to die.

This reconstruction appears unlikely in several respects, even more so in light of the rumors relating to the new assessments carried out on the woman’s body.

It should be noted first of all that, as we were saying, Liliana Resinovich’s clothes, but above all her shoes, were found substantially clean. Very few leaves were found inside the two bags in which the woman’s body was contained and this appears difficult to be compatible with the hypothesis that Liliana walked along that path, wearing her shoes, without any foliage or of the earth and that, when inserting himself into the bags, he did not introduce the same plant material inside them (especially in the bag inserted by the feet).

It appears the same unlikely that the woman’s body remained in that grove for about twenty days, as also claimed by the zoologist Nicola Bressi, who was in charge of carrying out an assessment to ascertain which animals populate the wooded area around the San Giovanni park. In fact, the expert would have declared that the corpse could have been in the grove for a day, no more, otherwise it would have been attacked by the fauna that populates those areas, in particular wild boars and foxes.

But if Liliana’s body was brought to the grove at the latest the day before her discovery, excluding the hypothesis that Liliana herself may have gone there independently, not having on her items compatible with the surrounding environment, how can we explain the injuries found? And when did Liliana die?

Is it legitimate to assume that the woman was attacked? Could that attack have made her lose consciousness and, in that state of unconsciousness, she was therefore killed? Maybe with the bag over his head or with another means that could still cause asphyxiation?

It will be the task of this new report to establish when Liliana died and whether her body, as the biologist claims, arrived in the grove only a day before her discovery. Is it possible that Liliana was killed on the day of her disappearance? Which would explain a whole series of other elements, i.e. that she was wearing the same clothes in which she was seen by the cameras that morning, the same bag, moreover she was still found wearing it over her shoulder and the same gastric contents.

But if that were the case, where was Liliana’s body kept for those twenty days? And above all, how was it preserved? Maybe some answers to these questions they could come from some traces found on the woman’s clothing and from some small insects found dead on her body. Understanding its nature and origin could lead investigators to the place where the body may have been kept hidden before being moved to the grove, perhaps precisely so that it could be found.

Following this hypothesis, it would be very relevant to research and investigate the movements of the people close to Liliana in those days if the body was moved a few days before its discovery.

New elements, those that are emerging from the work of the expert panel which are more compatible with a hypothesis other than that of suicide and which could lead to a new analysis and a different reading of the elements already acquired.