And while the Queen represented security, King Charles is quite the opposite – a source of concern.
King Charles III Coronation (Beta/AP)
Although at the very beginning, more precisely at the inauguration itself, he decided to proceed sparingly, the foreign media now reported on the king’s greed, which could greatly affect the monarchy. Greed could lead to the monarchy not only collapsing, but even being abolished.
The king of unrest spends money
“The King seems stubbornly continuing to do so, and William shows no signs of being different,” commented journalist Ann Wilson.
Dissatisfaction with the work of the king and queen also surfaced during their visit to Australia when they were booed in parliament by a woman who called for greater recognition of the rights of the indigenous population, which, according to Wilson, did not happen when the late queen visited Australia. In addition, at gatherings attended by the royal family, signs saying “Not My King” can often be seen, which shows the lack of sense of connection among the people.
Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II (AP Photo/Rebecca Naden/Pool, File)
“At the moment, it can be said that the monarchy seems strong. However, three of her most important pillars – King Charles, Queen Camilla and Princess Kate – have battled illnesses over the past year. Imagine if the royal family with King Charles, Camilla and Kate disappeared from the scene. How powerful would it look then?”, says the foreign media, which raises doubts about the future of the monarchy.
Eggs on the king: Charles on the TARGET of protesters (VIDEO)
Source: bizlife.rs
