Debatable decisions of the judges!
After defeat Natalia Šadrina u quarter finals, which passed with a lot of controversies, the selector of the Serbian national team in boxing presented their view of the situation, Mirko Ždralo, as well as a member of the IOC Board of Directors, Nenad Lalović.
– Disaster! I can’t understand that the match went to the Chinese woman. Natalija was absolutely better, this was a convincing match, and I am amazed at what the judges did. Natalija won both the first and third rounds, and the second was a split decision. I can’t figure it out, anything is possible it seems… – He said A sinkhole.
Did you applaud the judges?
– Yes I am. Out of protest for everything they did. We can’t do anything beyond that – said the exasperated selector.
– I don’t know how the victory was awarded to the Chinese woman. I really don’t understand the judges and their criteria. Even in judo, some things were not clear to me, especially here. Three judges voted for a tie, and two for our boxer. Later in the revoting, those three gave victory to the Chinese woman. I really don’t understand anything. I followed the match through the application and was convinced that the victory would go to Natalya – He said Lalović.
– There is always room for appeal. It is now up to the Boxing Association and OKS. The question is whether it is possible to change the decision, but there are two days until 1/2, if I’m not mistaken, maybe something can be done – he concluded Lalović.
Source: hotsport.rs
