Most journalists and politicians easily passed Marcel Ciolacu’s TV performance, broadcast from Budapestin the prime time of Antena 3 on Thursday evening. He also allowed himself a whim, an arrogance, he confessed. Marcel Ciolacu probably wanted to call it extravagance, although from extravagance to arrogance is quite a distance. They are only brought together by a phonetic ending and, in his case, a legal provision.
“We wanted to have an arrogance too.” “He is someone who once did not want to make a joke “I did not come from the monastery to politics, I would be a hypocrite to say otherwise”. he added wildly and furiously.
Far from the breathing of the one he supports, Mihai Gîdea could not temper him or wink at him. Which is why he had to let him express himself freely. Trampled by the revelation in G4media, Marcel Ciolacu whirled around and tried to defend himself, plunging even more into terrible considerations and revelations.
What is “arrogance” in a prime minister? An extravagance he allowed himself without respecting the law. What does the Explanatory Dictionary of the Romanian Language say about the meaning of the word “arrogance”?
“ARROGANT, -Ă, arrogant, -te, adj. Who behaves with arrogance, with arrogance; naughty. V. dry”.
On the one hand, Ciolacu claims to be “a normal man”. On the other hand, he tells us that he and his son allowed themselves an “arrogance”.
Only arrogance (be it extravagance) is impermissible in the case of a dignitary when he is asked to account for his connections with a company that has created trouble for hundreds of companies and citizens. Plus the fact that he and his son benefited from gifts of a value still difficult to estimate.
At which hotel did Marcel Ciolacu and his son live in Monte Carlo? During the Grand Prix of the Principality of Monaco in Formula 1, not necessarily at the Hotel Hermitage Monte Carlo or the Hotel de Paris, at more modest hotels, a room reaches 1,000 euros. We multiply a modest price by three nights to which we should also add the price of tickets. The thought makes me suspect that Marcel Ciolacu and his son did not stay at 3 stars, but at 5 and, because he was a dignitary, they booked a suite or at least an apartment. So what were the expenses for the two? Of course, but let’s know what bills to expect! And, if the payment was made through Nordis Travel SRL (also a Nordis piggy bank), all the more simple. There is no need to collect a bunch of invoices for flight and hotel accommodation. I can clarify with some papers.
But how much did the Formula 1 tickets cost? And how much did they cost for the other people in the PSD leadership? And who paid for at least three meals for the 7-8 people? Still Nordis? Or Nordis Travel? You mean the Ciorbă-Vicol family? Or did the guests of honor settle all expenses in German?
“There’s someone who once didn’t want to have fun!”
What is this “fad”?
MOFT, mofturi, sn (Fam.) 1. Thing, matter without value, without significance; trifle, nothing, trifle. ◊ Expr. To walk with whims = to invoke baseless reasons. (Rare) Cunning, cunning. 2. (At pl.) Caprices, fans, noses, fashions. – From Turkish. müft. (DEX)
The special three-day race with a private jet chartered for the Grand Prix in Monaco was a luxury that gives the prime minister an undeclared benefit of around 10-15,000 euros. With everything, maybe more. It is by no means a “fad”, although he in his babbling of language and thought meant “extravagance”. As things stand, it is both extravagance and arrogance. Or if it is a fad, then, at its level, the extravagance is measured in hundreds of thousands of euros. It really has to be much more.
After these revelations and confessions, my opinion is that Marcel Ciolacu can afford tens of thousands of euros in “luxuries”. The prime minister, in the same group, plus or minus one minister, plus Sorina (Stan) Docuz allowed himself several such “luxuries” of 10-14, maybe even 20,000 euros, with meals and tickets to competitions or concerts. G4Media claims to have evidence of five such trips. The whims of the prime minister and the former president of the Chamber of Deputies are approaching 100,000 euros.
I’m afraid that since it’s not just some match or plane tickets, but much more (the head of the Legal Commission, etc.) it’s neither a fad nor a joke. It is vertiginously approaching corruption! As such, let’s not talk about trifles and fads!
On the same occasion of involuntary sincerity, Marcel Ciolacu would declare:
“I did not come from the monastery into politics, I would be a hypocrite to say otherwise!”.
I did not imagine that the man would be an angel or an innocent, but this statement forces me to assume that Marcel Ciolacu allowed himself several such “fads”, plus some bigger “sins”. As whims do not really enter into the behavior of monks, I am forced to think about sins. I must go further with what his statement implies “I didn’t come from the monastery into politics.”
It makes sense that man is full of such whims. And unfortunately. Smaller or more “cannons”. Marcel Ciolacu said in anger that he is full of sins, whims being a thorn that we should easily pass over.
As for sins, at such a level, they are measured in millions of euros and dollars. And only a small part in lei.
Source: www.cotidianul.ro
