ENERGY
The government’s plans to build new nuclear power can have major economic consequences for generations to come, according to Tomas Kåberger, professor of industrial energy policy.
– The risk that you ultimately run is that these projects are not completed, he says.
On Thursday, Kåberger and other experts were invited to a meeting in the Riksdag’s finance committee on the topic of financing new nuclear power.
The government has set the goal of having nuclear power equivalent to two large-scale reactors in place by the year 2035.
Affects generations
To make this possible, an investigation proposes a new financing model. The three components of it are government loans, a price hedging agreement – with a guaranteed price of 80 öre/kWh – and a risk and profit sharing mechanism.
– You can imagine that for an ordinary Swedish villa household, it costs SEK 50-60 a month to have a price hedging agreement like this, says Minister of Financial Markets Niklas Wykman (M).
At the same time, Tomas Kåberger at Chalmers University of Technology warns that many nuclear power projects in the world have become more expensive than what was first said, and if the state is included in the equation, taxpayers risk being hit hard.
– This is a proposal with very large financial consequences for many decades. These are decisions to be made by a generation, and by people who risk not only their own money, but that of future generations as well.
He points to two projects in the US that have been canceled even though upwards of SEK 100 billion have already been invested in them.
– The risk that you ultimately run is that these projects will not be completed anyway, says Kåberger about the Swedish nuclear power plans.
Risk until 2040
In Sweden, the cost of nuclear power can amount to SEK 600 billion or more, he says. Kåberger also highlights that the cost of solar and wind power continues to fall.
Another expert on the panel, Mia Bodin of Bodecker Partners, pointed out that the financing model risks the profitability of all existing electricity generation and new generation until 2035-2045, when nuclear power may be in place.
– It risks Swedish industry’s green transformation and competitiveness, she says.
Even from the side of the opposition, the criticism is harsh.
– The analysis we saw at the hearing shows that this will be terribly expensive for ordinary consumers and the industry, says Center Party spokesperson Martin Ådahl.
Source: www.nyteknik.se